February 10, 2010

"Lost" has become a show about questions, questions, questions
"How," asks Heather Havrilesky, "did a character-driven drama with metaphysical undertones and a sociopolitical allegory at its core slowly devolve into a maze of dead ends and lingering questions? And how is it that every question posed on 'Lost' is answered with another question? These are the questions, questions, questions that haunt us when Tuesday night's second episode of the final season of 'Lost' begins – yes – with even more questions: How did Sayid come back to life? 'What happened to me?' he asks, and then 'Who are these people? What do they want?'"
2nd episode draws 11 million // How did "Lost" become such a predictable bore?
"What Kate Does" adds fuel to anti-Losties // Would Losties want it any other way?
"It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia's" Rob McElhenney was too distracting
Why four toes? Diabetes! // A Kate episode doesn't always have to be bad
Is LAX an alternate timeline? // This was a really good Season 1 throwback episode
Is it too much to ask for characters to behave rationally within an outlandish premise?

[Permalink]

Previous post:

Next post: